The next topic on Haidt's list is Fairness. What's fair, what's not? Who gets how much and why? Should our life choices be determined by our level of competence? What if we are incompetent? Or, more to the point, what if we are incompetent in those things society currently values most? For which they are willing to put out the most recompense? Do those who work hardest deserve the most money?
Do we - should we - all get what's coming to us? Read more about What's Fair?
There must be stages of caring, like there are for grieving.
Stage 1: Oh you poor thing.
Stage 2: Here, have a banana. Or would you rather have this $50.
Stage 3: I’ve got some numbers for you to call. Have you tried acupuncture?
Stage 4: (pretend you’re not home)
Stage 5: Pay me to care.
There’s been some discussion lately about the differences between Conservatives and Liberals when it comes to values such as caring. Who cares more? About what? And how? Read more about Who Cares?
Watching Bill Moyers' interview with Jonathan Haidt last weekend, I was frustrated by the way in which both Liberals and Conservatives were being dis-served by the qualities impugned to them under each of Haidt's determinative categories:
That's what's going in Rocky's stocking next Christmas.
"'You cannot wave the white flag and let the environmentalists and regulators declare victory here in the heart of coal country.'
Rocky Adkins, a state representative from Kentucky, in response to a plan for one of the state's largest power plants to switch from coal to natural gas." That was the New York Times Quote of the Day, for 29 May. Read more about A Lump of Coal
Catching up with the April issue of the Smithsonian, the monthly magazine of The Smithsonian Institution, I came across a story about Neal Stephenson and the project he calls Hieroglyph. Read more about Fictional Solutions
A couple of days ago, I made the claim that the ancient Greek historian, Thucydides, would be able to appear on Fareed Zakaria GPS - hell, even Charlie Rose - and be right in the swing of things in no time.
Thought I would use today to give you a sampling of quotes from :
For the love of gain would reconcile the weaker to the dominion of the stronger, and the possession of capital enabled the more powerful to reduce the smaller cities to subjection. Book I, 1.8
Read more about Thucydides Redux
January 2008. I'm watching Barack Obama speaking in the Ebeneezer Baptist Church in Atlanta, the Sunday before Martin Luther King Day. To a largely black audience, televised to an even larger audience, among whom had to be most of the black population of North America, a week before the South Carolina primary when he would need every black vote in the state. Read more about Coming Out
Yesterday, we saw the latest iteration of the Occupy Movement, the spring initiative in taking it to the streets. I wish they would have brought flowers and danced more (it being May Day), but overall I applaud them. If they do it right, they will have an impact for positive change that we may live to see take effect in the years to come. In the meantime, the business of the people is being done on a daily basis, the old fashioned way. And I am challenging anybody complaining about politics or politicians. "Have you ever been to a meeting?" Read more about Go To Meetin'
Got into a frustrating back and forth yesterday with some folks who are friends of someone I knew in college a century or two ago and who is a fan of all things right.
It began with the post of a word:
defined as:
Read more about When Christianism Was a Good ThingA system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.